As promised, here is my second interview blog with Caleb Burnett. I wanted to see how Caleb thought Twitter would affect the upcoming presidential race, so I asked him. He said, “Twitter is just another way for candidates to communicate and influence voters. I feel as if it is not used quite as much as Facebook, but close. It is all in how the candidates use it, and some candidates are making sure voters know how they feel about everything, and some are not. Whoever wins the most people over on Twitter, they can be satisfied with themselves knowing no one else is going to get those votes because they did not make the effort.”
Looking back at what Caleb told me, I realize that from what I have seen, this is mostly true. I know that candidates who use Twitter will definitely gain voters from there that other candidates will not. However, although Twitter has become such a large social network, I still don’t think that it can play a deciding factor in an election. Just because a candidate tweets a bunch of stuff about their campaign does not mean that they will overtake the other competition. Candidates have to be able to find a balance between campaigning on Twitter so that they can win in more than just one category. Twitter is a great outlet to let people know your ideology and your stance on different topics, but it is not enough to win an election by itself.
I asked Caleb these questions because I have seen him being very active in politics on Twitter. Seeing someone be that involved in politics at my age is rare, and Caleb seems to know his stuff when it comes to politics. This is encouraging to know, given that generally people our age are disinterested in politics and think that they are non applicable to them. This interview gave me a chance to see and listen to someone who is passionate about our government and is looking for change.